![Joint effect of body mass index and waist circumference on lung cancer risk, excluding the first five years of follow-up, by sex, smoking status, race, and tumor histology. Cox regression analyses were carried out with stratification by cohort, year of enrollment (five-year intervals from <1985 to >2005), and year of birth (five-year intervals from <1925 to >1960), and adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity (white, black, Asian, or other), educational attainment (≤high school, vocational school or some college, college or graduate school), smoking history (never, former, or current use of cigarettes, cigars, or pipe), pack-years of cigarette smoking, age of smoking initiation, years since smoking cessation, family history of lung cancer (yes, no, or unknown), physical activity level (low, middle, or high, measured by metabolic equivalents or hours of exercise), alcohol consumption (none, moderate, or heavy [>14 g/d for women and >28 g/d for men]), and, in women, menopausal status (pre or post). High WC was defined as waist circumference ≥94 cm for non-Asian men, ≥90 cm for Asian men, and ≥80 cm for all women, according to World Health Organization classifications (high and very high levels as shown in Table 5). Pinteraction values were .95 with sex, .67 with smoking status, and .75 with race/ethnicity. Pheterogeneity between histological types was .37. The entire follow-up time was included because of a small number of black participants. All statistical tests were two-sided. BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; WC = waist circumference. m_djx286f1.png?Expires=1520441321&Signat](https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/oup/backfile/Content_public/Journal/jnci/PAP/10.1093_jnci_djx286/2/m_djx286f1.png?Expires=1520441321&Signature=FCQS5NrqfZV2xM0HUoPKZXtjG2QUbin45I8tDYEef3ou~ZmnE6uvqFSJJrP9UHs1Gg15oxSwka2aRMTgR3TuiAT-KFGzDeyJ4BxLin8qIsuQWDyxxKALcTZ4wzTXT1Jq2e4Xc00jLBYWCVd6l0Wu8VOCP2a6ffkq1dOrJxgXiEUxmHmgAzdWDTkJtih5buKpPWDqjaVxobFZNLs4R-30KjkYifGAJEwqY-1xpTIHKqUIV1yvpJ1zk4ooD~LA-h--ArbFJaxBZEv-JhEzjnNfndC~AqGy87Dk6ziBIJQPN4lnChPSyiGdiM2Gmg426G8owW4lBkZlyC09dS7Lefa6BQ__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIUCZBIA4LVPAVW3Q)
Abstract
Background
The obesity–lung cancer association remains controversial. Concerns over confounding by smoking and reverse causation persist. The influence of obesity type and effect modifications by race/ethnicity and tumor histology are largely unexplored. Methods
We examined associations of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-hip ratio (WHR) with lung cancer risk among 1.6 million Americans, Europeans, and Asians. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with adjustment for potential confounders. Analyses for WC/WHR were further adjusted for BMI. The joint effect of BMI and WC/WHR was also evaluated. Results
During an average 12-year follow-up, 23 732 incident lung cancer cases were identified. While BMI was generally associated with a decreased risk, WC and WHR were associated with increased risk after controlling for BMI. These associations were seen 10 years before diagnosis in smokers and never smokers, were strongest among blacks, and varied by histological type. After excluding the first five years of follow-up, hazard ratios per 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI were 0.95 (95% CI = 0.90 to 1.00), 0.92 (95% CI = 0.89 to 0.95), and 0.89 (95% CI = 0.86 to 0.91) in never, former, and current smokers, and 0.86 (95% CI = 0.84 to 0.89), 0.94 (95% CI = 0.90 to 0.99), and 1.09 (95% CI = 1.03 to 1.15) for adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, and small cell carcinoma, respectively. Hazard ratios per 10 cm increase in WC were 1.09 (95% CI = 1.00 to 1.18), 1.12 (95% CI = 1.07 to 1.17), and 1.11 (95% CI = 1.07 to 1.16) in never, former, and current smokers, and 1.06 (95% CI = 1.01 to 1.12), 1.20 (95% CI = 1.12 to 1.29), and 1.13 (95% CI = 1.04 to 1.23) for adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, and small cell carcinoma, respectively. Participants with BMIs of less than 25 kg/m2 but high WC had a 40% higher risk (HR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.26 to 1.56) than those with BMIs of 25 kg/m2 or greater but normal/moderate WC. Conclusions
The inverse BMI–lung cancer association is not entirely due to smoking and reverse causation. Central obesity, particularly concurrent with low BMI, may help identify high-risk populations for lung cancer.http://ift.tt/2D4hKBG
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου