Abstract
Introduction
Mastectomy (MAS) and lumpectomy (LUMP) are the two common local surgical treatments for early breast cancer. There has been a debate whether MAS or LUMP results in better quality of life (QOL). The purpose of this study was to examine the symptom burden (SB) and QOL of both MAS and LUMP patients.
Methods
Patients at the Louise Temerty Breast Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada, were approached to complete two self-administered questionnaires, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Score (ESAS) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Breast (FACT-B) cancer edition. Additionally, patient demographics were recorded from medical records. Patients were divided into two cohorts depending on their surgical treatment: MAS and LUMP. The QOL and SB, assessed by FACT-B and ESAS, respectively, of MAS and LUMP patients were compared. The analysis was repeated excluding patients with metastases.
Results
From January to August 2014, 614 MAS and 801 LUMP patients were accrued. The MAS patients reported a lower QOL in all categories, except social well-being. There was however no statistical difference in ESAS scores for MAS and LUMP patients with non-metastatic breast cancer.
Conclusion
This study supports existing literature that SB of MAS and LUMP patients without metastases are similar. QOL of MAS patients including those with metastases was lower than that of LUMP patients.
from Cancer via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/21HpHCy
via IFTTT
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου