Luteal versus follicular phase surgical oophorectomy plus tamoxifen in premenopausal women with metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

Publication date: June 2016
Source:European Journal of Cancer, Volume 60
Author(s): Richard R. Love, Syed Mozammel Hossain, Md. Margub Hussain, Mohammad Golam Mostafa, Adriano V. Laudico, Stephen Sixto S. Siguan, Clement Adebamowo, Jing-zhong Sun, Fei Fei, Zhi-Ming Shao, Yunjiang Liu, Syed Md. Akram Hussain, Baoning Zhang, Lin Cheng, Sonar Panigaro, Fardiana Walta, Jiang Hong Chuan, Maria Rica Mirasol-Lumague, Cheng-Har Yip, Narciso S. Navarro, Chiun-sheng Huang, Yen-shen Lu, Tahmina Ferdousy, Reza Salim, Chameli Akhter, Shamsun Nahar, Gemma Uy, Gregory S. Young, Erinn M. Hade, David Jarjoura
PurposeIn premenopausal women with metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, hormonal therapy is the first-line therapy. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue + tamoxifen therapies have been found to be more effective. The pattern of recurrence risk over time after primary surgery suggests that peri-operative factors impact recurrence. Secondary analyses of an adjuvant trial suggested that the luteal phase timing of surgical oophorectomy in the menstrual cycle simultaneous with primary breast surgery favourably influenced long-term outcomes.MethodsTwo hundred forty-nine premenopausal women with incurable or metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer entered a trial in which they were randomised to historical mid-luteal or mid-follicular phase surgical oophorectomy followed by oral tamoxifen treatment. Kaplan–Meier methods, the log-rank test, and multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess overall and progression-free survival (PFS) in the two randomised groups and by hormone-confirmed menstrual cycle phase.ResultsOverall survival (OS) and PFS were not demonstrated to be different in the two randomised groups. In a secondary analysis, OS appeared worse in luteal phase surgery patients with progesterone levels <2 ng/ml (anovulatory patients; adjusted hazard ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89–2.41, p = 0.14) compared with those in luteal phase with progesterone level of 2 ng/ml or higher. Median OS was 2 years (95% CI: 1.7–2.3) and OS at 4 years was 26%.ConclusionsThe history-based timing of surgical oophorectomy in the menstrual cycle did not influence outcomes in this trial of metastatic patients.ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00293540.



from Cancer via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/20Z5Fog
via IFTTT