Source:Cancer Epidemiology, Volume 54
Author(s): Laura Botta, Riccardo Capocaccia, Annalisa Trama, Christian Herrmann, Diego Salmerón, Roberta De Angelis, Sandra Mallone, Ettore Bidoli, Rafael Marcos-Gragera, Dorota Dudek-Godeau, Gemma Gatta, Ramon Cleries
BackgroundThe RARECAREnet project has updated the estimates of the burden of the 198 rare cancers in each European country. Suspecting that scant data could affect the reliability of statistical analysis, we employed a Bayesian approach to estimate the incidence of these cancers.MethodsWe analyzed about 2,000,000 rare cancers diagnosed in 2000–2007 provided by 83 population-based cancer registries from 27 European countries. We considered European incidence rates (IRs), calculated over all the data available in RARECAREnet, as a valid a priori to merge with country-specific observed data. Therefore we provided (1) Bayesian estimates of IRs and the yearly numbers of cases of rare cancers in each country; (2) the expected time (T) in years needed to observe one new case; and (3) practical criteria to decide when to use the Bayesian approach.ResultsBayesian and classical estimates did not differ much; substantial differences (>10%) ranged from 77 rare cancers in Iceland to 14 in England. The smaller the population the larger the number of rare cancers needing a Bayesian approach. Bayesian estimates were useful for cancers with fewer than 150 observed cases in a country during the study period; this occurred mostly when the population of the country is small.ConclusionFor the first time the Bayesian estimates of IRs and the yearly expected numbers of cases for each rare cancer in each individual European country were calculated. Moreover, the indicator T is useful to convey incidence estimates for exceptionally rare cancers and in small countries; it far exceeds the professional lifespan of a medical doctor.
from Cancer via ola Kala on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2qNrrS6
via IFTTT
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου