Κυριακή 10 Απριλίου 2022

Tooth‐cusp preservation with lithium disilicate onlay restorations: A fatigue resistance study

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Objectives

This study examined the in vitro fatigue resistance of maxillary premolars with 2 mm or 3 mm preserved cusp thicknesses restored with lithium disilicate onlays.

Materials and Methods

Premolars(N = 48) were divided into six groups. Onlays for groups 1 to 4 preserved a 3 mm functional (G1), 2 mm functional (G2), 3 mm nonfunctional (G3), or 2 mm nonfunctional (G4) buccal-lingual cusp width. Onlays for group 5 (G5, control) replaced both cusps. Group 6 (G6) samples were identical to G1 with added retentive boxes. Lithium disilicate onlays were exposed to thermocycling (10 000 cycles, 5°C-55°C, 30s/cycle) and mechanical loading (1.2 million cycles at 1.4 Hz and 70 N). All samples were examined for onlay debonding or cusp or onlay fracture.

Results

Failure rates were 75%(G1), 0.0%(G2), 12.5%(G3), 0.0%(G4), 0.0%(G5), and 0.0%(G6). The difference in percent failure between the groups preserving the functional cusps (37.5%) and the groups preserving the nonfunctional cusps (6.3%) was statistically significant (P = .04; 95%CI:2.11-55.66). No cusp or restoration fractures were observed; all failures were due to debonding of the restoration.

Conclusion

Teeth with thin remaining cusps that were restored with bonded lithium disilicate onlay restorations were not prone to fracture. Retentive preparation features that physically eliminated lateral displacement prevented onlay debonding even though the ceramic-enamel margin was directly at the occlusal contact.

Clinical significance

The use of adhesively retained lithium disilicate ceramic onlays may be a viable alternative to full coverage restorations and may challenge traditionally accepted principals related to preparation resistance and retention form of ceramic partial coverage restorations.

View on the web

Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Δημοσίευση σχολίου