Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 Activity of Targeted Kinase Inhibitors: Repurposing Clinically Available Drugs for COVID‐19 Therapy

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 Activity of Targeted Kinase Inhibitors: Repurposing Clinically Available Drugs for COVID‐19 Therapy via Journal of Medical Virology Abstract Purpose Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains a major public health concern, and vaccine unavailability, hesitancy, or failure underscore the need for discovery of efficacious antiviral drug therapies. Numerous approved drugs target protein kinases associated with viral life cycle and symptoms of infection. Repurposing of kinase inhibitors is appealing as they have been vetted for safety and are more accessible for COVID-19 treatment. However, an understanding of drug mechanism is needed to improve our understanding of the factors involved in pathogenesis. Methods We tested the in vitro activity of three kinase inhibitors against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), including inhibitors of AXL kinase, a host cell factor that contributes to successful SARS-CoV-2 infection. Using multiple cell-based assays and approaches, gilteritinib, nintedanib, and imatinib were thoroughly evaluated for activity against SARS-CoV-2 varian ts. Results Each drug exhibited antiviral activity, but with stark differences in potency, suggesting differences in host dependency for kinase targets. Importantly, for gilteritinib, the amount of compound needed to achieve 90% infection inhibition, at least in part involving blockade of spike protein-mediated viral entry and at concentrations not inducing phospholipidosis (PLD), approached a clinically achievable concentration. Knockout of AXL, a target of gilteritinib and nintedanib, impaired SARS-CoV-2 variant infectivity, supporting a role for AXL in SARS-CoV-2 infection and supporting further investigation of drug-mediated AXL inhibition as a COVID-19 treatment. Conclusions This work supports further evaluation of AXL-targeting kinase inhibitors as potential antiviral agents and treatments for COVID-19. Additional mechanistic studies are needed to determine underlying differences in virus response. This article is protected by copyright. All r ights reserved. View on Web

Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

14‐day famciclovir treatment significantly reduces the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia in elderly patients with herpes zoster

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader 14‐day famciclovir treatment significantly reduces the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia in elderly patients with herpes zoster via Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (Left) For elderly patients with herpes zoster, the NRS in the 14-day FCV group was significantly lower than that of the 7-day FCV group on the 14th and 21st days after starting treatment. (Right) The incidence of PHN was 25.4% in the 7-day FCV group and 7.6% in the 14-day FCV group. With moderate or severe initial pain, the incidence of PHN was significantly lower in patients treated with 14-day FCV therapy than in those treated with 7-day FCV therapy. Abstract What is known and objective Pain is the main symptom of herpes zoster (HZ), whilst postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a long-term unbearable pain, which seriously affects the quality of life of patients and is also the most intractable problem for clinicians. Early antiviral treatment is considered as a key measure to reduce acute pain and PHN. Nevertheless, most patients still have long-term pain after 7 days of antiviral treatment, and some patients will develop PHN. This study aimed to investigate whether prolonged duration of antiviral therapy could reduce HZ acute pain and the occurrence of PHN. Methods The outpatient data of HZ patients over 50 years old who visited the Dermatology Department from January 2016 to May 2018 were retrospectively analysed. According to the different courses of treatment of famciclovir (FCV), the patients were divided into 7-day FCV group and 14-day FCV group. The numerical rating scale (NRS) score at the first visit and on the 7th, 14th and 21st days after the start of treatment, the adverse drug reactions and the incidence of PHN were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 219 patients were involved in the analysis. For acute pain control, the 14-day FCV group was better than the 7-day FCV group. For patients with mild initial pain, there was no significant difference in NRS between the two treatments. For patients with moderate-to-severe initial pain, the NRS in the 14-day FCV group was significantly lower than that of the 7-day FCV group on the 14th and 21st days after starting treatment. PHN occurred in patients with moderate-to-severe initial pain, and the incidence was significantly lower in the 14-day FCV group than in the 7-day FCV group. There was no significant difference in the number of adverse reactions between the two groups. What is new and conclusion Compared with the traditional 7-day antiviral therapy, the 14-day course of FCV can reduce the acute pain and the incidence of PHN in elderly patients with HZ, especially in patients with moderate to severe initial pain. Prolonging the course of medication did not increase the side effects. View on Web

Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

EGFR, the Lazarus target for precision oncology in glioblastoma

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader EGFR, the Lazarus target for precision oncology in glioblastoma via Neuro-Oncology Advance Access Abstract The Lazarus effect is a rare condition that happens when someone seemingly dead shows signs of life. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) represents a target in the fatal neoplasm glioblastoma (GBM) that through a series of negative clinical trials has prompted a vocal subset of the neuro-oncology community to declare this target dead. However, an argument can be made that the core tenets of precision oncology were overlooked in the initial clinical enthusiasm over EGFR as a therapeutic target in GBM. Namely, the wrong drugs were tested on the wrong patients at the wrong time. Furthermore, new insights into the biology of EGFR in GBM vis-à-vis other EGFR-driven neoplasms, such as non-small cell lung cancer, and development of novel GBM-specific EGFR therapeutics resurrects this target for future studies. Here, we will examine the distinct EGFR biology in GBM, how it exacerbates the challenge of treating a CNS neoplasm, how these unique ch allenges have influenced past and present EGFR-targeted therapeutic design and clinical trials, and what adjustments are needed to therapeutically exploit EGFR in this devastating disease. View on Web

Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.