Targeting Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) in Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with the Second-Generation ALK Inhibitor Ceritinib

Abstract

Background

The receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) has been implicated in the tumorigenesis of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). However, the exact role of ALK in RMS is debatable and remains to be elucidated.

Objective

To determine the in vitro and in vivo effects and mechanism of action of the second-generation ALK inhibitor ceritinib on RMS cell growth.

Methods

Effects of ceritinib on cell proliferation, wound healing, cell cycle, and RTK signaling were determined in alveolar and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS, ERMS). In addition, possible synergistic effects of combined treatment with ceritinib and the Abl/Src family kinase inhibitor dasatinib were determined.

Results

Ceritinib treatment led to decreased cell proliferation, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and decreased in vivo tumor growth for the ARMS subtype. ERMS cell lines were less affected and showed no cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. Both subtypes lacked intrinsic ALK phosphorylation, and ceritinib was shown to affect the IGF1R signaling pathway. High levels of phosphorylated Src (Tyr416) were present following ceritinib treatment, making combined treatment with a Src inhibitor a potential treatment option. Combined treatment of ceritinib and dasatinib showed synergistic effects in both ERMS and ARMS cell lines.

Conclusion

This study shows that monotherapy with an ALK inhibitor, such as ceritinib, in RMS, has no effect on ALK signaling. However, the synergistic effects of ceritinib and dasatinib are promising, most probably due to targeting of IGF1R and Src.

http://ift.tt/2yFiu2h

A Multi-Arm Phase I Study of the PI3K/mTOR Inhibitors PF-04691502 and Gedatolisib (PF-05212384) plus Irinotecan or the MEK Inhibitor PD-0325901 in Advanced Cancer

Abstract

Background

This phase I, four-arm, open-label study (NCT01347866) evaluated the PI3K/mTOR inhibitors PF-04691502 (arms A, B) and gedatolisib (PF-05212384; arms C, D) in combination with the MEK inhibitor PD-0325901 (arm A, D) or irinotecan (arm B, C) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Objectives

Primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity with each combination. Secondary endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary antitumor activity.

Patients and Methods

Dose escalation followed a 3 + 3 design in arm C and a zone-based design in arm D.

Results

The PF-04691502 combination arms were closed prematurely due to low tolerability, and the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) were not determined for either arm. The MTD for the combination of gedatolisib with irinotecan 180 mg/m² was estimated to be 110 mg weekly and for the combination with PD-0325901 was not reached at the highest dose evaluated (gedatolisib 154 mg weekly). Plasma concentrations of gedatolisib were generally similar across dose groups in arm C (with irinotecan) and arm D (with PD-0325901). Frequent dose delays or dose reductions were required for both combinations, potentially preventing sustained therapeutic drug concentrations. Gedatolisib plus irinotecan produced a response rate of ~5% and clinical benefit in 16% of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (progression-free survival, 2.8 months). Preliminary evidence of clinical activity was observed with gedatolisib plus PD-0325901 in patients with ovarian cancer (three partial responses, n = 5) or endometrial cancer (one partial response, n = 1) and KRAS mutations.

Conclusions

Further evaluations of gedatolisib are warranted in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

http://ift.tt/2yFz3Lx

The dawn of “immune-revolution” in children: early experiences with checkpoint inhibitors in childhood malignancies

Abstract

Modern immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has changed clinical practice of adult patients with advanced cancer. Blockade of CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways have shown survival benefits in different diseases. In children, combination of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy have improved survival rates of solid tumors. However, the outcomes for subsets of patients such as those with high-grade, refractory, or metastatic disease remain extremely poor. Currently, the treatment of these patients is almost exclusively based on standard chemotherapy. The significant proportion of pediatric cancers with high number of mutations and subsequent high expression of neoantigens, together with the potential prognostic role of the immunosuppressive checkpoint molecules (CTLA-4, PD-L1) can represent a promising rationale that support the use of checkpoint inhibitors. We made a revision about emerging data regarding safety and activity of checkpoint inhibitors in children with solid tumors.

from Cancer via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2gARJS3
via IFTTT

The dawn of “immune-revolution” in children: early experiences with checkpoint inhibitors in childhood malignancies

Abstract

Modern immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has changed clinical practice of adult patients with advanced cancer. Blockade of CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways have shown survival benefits in different diseases. In children, combination of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy have improved survival rates of solid tumors. However, the outcomes for subsets of patients such as those with high-grade, refractory, or metastatic disease remain extremely poor. Currently, the treatment of these patients is almost exclusively based on standard chemotherapy. The significant proportion of pediatric cancers with high number of mutations and subsequent high expression of neoantigens, together with the potential prognostic role of the immunosuppressive checkpoint molecules (CTLA-4, PD-L1) can represent a promising rationale that support the use of checkpoint inhibitors. We made a revision about emerging data regarding safety and activity of checkpoint inhibitors in children with solid tumors.

http://ift.tt/2gARJS3

Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy

Vanita Noronha, Vijay Patil, Amit Joshi, Anuradha Chougule, Atanu Bhattacharjee, Rajiv Kumar, Sucheta More, Supriya Goud, Ashay Karpe, Anant Ramaswamy, Nikhil Pande, Arun Chandrasekharan, Alok Goel, Vikas Talreja, Abhishek Mahajan, Amit Janu, Nilendu Purandare and Kumar Prabhash

from Cancer via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2zMQFT9
via IFTTT

Laparoscopic liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer treatment: comparison with long-term results using the conventional approach

Rafael José Maurette, Marcos García Ejarque, Matías Mihura, Mariano Bregante, Diego Bogetti and Daniel Pirchi

from Cancer via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2xj6PC9
via IFTTT

Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy

Vanita Noronha, Vijay Patil, Amit Joshi, Anuradha Chougule, Atanu Bhattacharjee, Rajiv Kumar, Sucheta More, Supriya Goud, Ashay Karpe, Anant Ramaswamy, Nikhil Pande, Arun Chandrasekharan, Alok Goel, Vikas Talreja, Abhishek Mahajan, Amit Janu, Nilendu Purandare and Kumar Prabhash

http://ift.tt/2zMQFT9