Publication date: 1 December 2016
Source:International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Volume 96, Issue 5
Author(s): Anne-Marie Charpentier, Debra L. Friedman, Suzanne Wolden, Cindy Schwartz, Bethany Gill, Jenna Sykes, Alisha Albert-Green, Kara M. Kelly, Louis S. Constine, David C. Hodgson
PurposeTo evaluate whether clinical risk factors could further distinguish children with intermediate-risk Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) with rapid early and complete anatomic response (RER/CR) who benefit significantly from involved-field RT (IFRT) from those who do not, and thereby aid refinement of treatment selection.Methods and MaterialsChildren with intermediate-risk HL treated on the Children's Oncology Group AHOD 0031 trial who achieved RER/CR with 4 cycles of chemotherapy, and who were randomized to 21-Gy IFRT or no additional therapy (n=716) were the subject of this study. Recursive partitioning analysis was used to identify factors associated with clinically and statistically significant improvement in event-free survival (EFS) after randomization to IFRT. Bootstrap sampling was used to evaluate the robustness of the findings.ResultAlthough most RER/CR patients did not benefit significantly from IFRT, those with a combination of anemia and bulky limited-stage disease (n=190) had significantly better 4-year EFS with the addition of IFRT (89.3% vs 77.9% without IFRT; P=.019); this benefit was consistently reproduced in bootstrap analyses and after adjusting for other prognostic factors.ConclusionAlthough most patients achieving RER/CR had favorable outcomes with 4 cycles of chemotherapy alone, those children with initial bulky stage I/II disease and anemia had significantly better EFS with the addition of IFRT as part of combined-modality therapy. Further work evaluating the interaction of clinical and biologic factors and imaging response is needed to further optimize and refine treatment selection.
from Cancer via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2hhpg1T
via IFTTT
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου