Role of treatment on the development of secondary malignancies in patients with essential thrombocythemia

Abstract

Aim of this study is to explore the role of different treatments on the development of secondary malignancies (SMs) in a large cohort of essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients. We report the experience of a regional cooperative group in a real-life cohort of 1026 patients with ET. We divided our population into five different groups: group 0, no treatment; group 1, hydroxyurea (HU); group 2, alkylating agents (ALK); group 3, ALK + HU sequentially or in combination; and group 4, anagrelide (ANA) and/or α-interferon (IFN) only. Patients from groups 1, 2, and 3 could also have been treated either with ANA and/or IFN in their medical history, considering these drugs not to have an additional cytotoxic potential. In all, 63 of the 1026 patients (6%) developed 64 SM during the follow-up, after a median time of 50 months (range: 2–158) from diagnosis. In univariate analysis, a statistically significant difference was found only for gender (P = 0.035) and age (P = 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, a statistically significant difference was maintained for both gender and age (gender HR1.7 [CI 95% 1.037–2.818] P = 0.035; age HR 4.190 [CI 95% 2.308–7.607] P = 0.0001). The impact of different treatments on SMs development was not statistically significant. In our series of 1026 ET patients, diagnosed and followed during a 30-year period, the different therapies administered, comprising HU and ALK, do not appear to have impacted on the development of SM. A similar rate of SMs was observed also in untreated patients. The only two variables which showed a statistical significance were male gender and age >60 years.

In our series of 1026 ET patients followed over a 30-year period, the different therapies administered, comprising HU and ALK, do not appear to have impacted on the development of SM. Thus, our study supports the idea that patients with MPNs develop SM regardless of the treatment modalities given. This could be due to the intrinsic chronic inflammation and immune deregulation in MPNs, which can be major contributing factors for the risk of second cancer.

from Cancer via ola Kala on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2qceIGd
via IFTTT