Abstract
Background
The prognosis of elderly patients with aggressive B-NHL after first lymphoma-related treatment failure (TF-L) is not well described. Methods
We analysed patient characteristics including presence of MYC rearrangements and MYC-expression (IHC) at diagnosis and modalities of salvage therapy and their impact on the prognosis of patients between 61 to 80 years who had been treated on the RICOVER-60 trial. Results
TF-L occurred in 301 of 1222 (24.6%) patients; 297 patients could be analyzed. Prognosis was extremely poor in patients with primary progressive disease or early relapse (≤12 months) with median survivals of 3.3 and 6.4 months. Survival after TF-L was significantly lower in patients pretreated with R-CHOP compared to CHOP (23.0% vs. 36.4% at 2 years, p = 0.016). In patients with MYC translocation at diagnosis Rituximab reduced the risk of TF-L from 58.8% to 26.3%. Survival after TF-L was significant longer for patients after CHOP without MYC translocations (31.8% vs. 0% at 2 years, p < 0.001) or negative MYC-IHC (41.0% vs. 16.8% at 2 years, p = 0.017) but not after R-CHOP. 224 patients (75.4%) received salvage therapy. Rituximab was part of salvage therapy in 57.4% and improved 2-year survival rate from 20.7% to 46.8% (p < 0.001). The benefit of R was significant after first-line CHOP (2-year-OS 49.6% vs. 19.1%, p < 0.001) as well as after R-CHOP (2-year-OS 33.1% and 22.5%, p = 0.034). For patients pretreated with R-CHOP long-term survival was below 15% regardless of the treatment chosen. Conclusion
MYC rearrangement and IHC are adverse prognostic factors after TF-L for CHOP treated patients, rituximab as part of first line therapy reduced the effects of MYC-break. Rituximab improves results of any type of salvage therapy, however survival after progression/relapse of aggressive B-cell lymphoma in elderly patients pretreated with (R)-CHOP is poor regardless of treatment chosen.http://ift.tt/2hUemEK
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου