Abstract
Pediatric meningiomas, which account for < 1% of all meningiomas, are thought to have unique features, including being more aggressive than their adult counterparts. The goal of this investigation was to compare pediatric and adult meningiomas in a large head-to-head comparison. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) datasets to compare meningioma demographics, first treatments, and outcomes among children/adolescents (0–21 years), young adults (22–45 years), and older adults (> 45 years). During 2004–2012, SEER contained 59148 patients age 0–107 years diagnosed with meningioma, with children/adolescents accounting for 381 (0.64%) patients. Unlike older and young adults, children/adolescents with meningioma did not demonstrate female predominance, and had an equal 1:1 male-to-female ratio. Children/adolescents also had almost three-times as many spinal tumors (13.1%) than young adults (4.2%) and older adults (4.4%). Both children/adolescents and young adults had undergone more gross total resections (both 43%) versus older adults (25%), and were treated more with radiation (14.6%, and 12.0% respectively) than their older counterparts (8.5%). In addition, both children/adolescents and young adults had significantly lower all-cause mortality (4.5% in both) than older adults (24.6%), during median 35-month follow-up. Inherent limitations of the SEER datasets restrict our ability to answer important questions regarding comparisons of tumor grading, histological diagnosis, cause-specific mortality, and neurofibromatosis status. Pediatric meningiomas appear distinct from their adult counterparts as they do not display the typical female predominance and include more clinically relevant spinal tumors. More extensive surgeries, greater use of radiation therapy, and lower all-cause mortality were seen in both children/adolescents and young adults, which raises questions regarding the perceived uniquely aggressive nature of pediatric meningiomas. However, due to the significant limitations of the SEER datasets, our results must be interpreted cautiously and stand only to foster novel questions, which would be better answered in well-designed, prospective studies.
http://ift.tt/2IgkShN
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου